Common Expense Default
Can owners withhold their common expenses if they are engaged in litigation with the Corporation? In a recent case, Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 396 v. Burdet, the Court of Appeal confirmed that common expenses are payable, even if there is on-going litigation relating to the validity of common expenses.
A group of owners and the Corporation had been engaged in a protracted dispute since 2000 relating to voting rights and financial matters. In 2009 the Corporation filed liens against the owners' units and subsequently commenced power of sale proceedings.
In response, the owners paid $104,185 to the solicitors for the Corporation, to be held in trust pending the resolution of issues in court proceedings. Thereafter the group of owners ceased paying common expenses altogether.
The trial judge had ordered that the amount held by the Corporation’s solicitors in trust be paid to the Corporation to be applied to common expense arrears and the group of owners was required to pay condo fees going forward. The owners appealed on the basis that as the Corporation owed money to the owners they had a right of set-off. The Court of Appeal rejected the owners’ position on the basis that section 84(3) of the Condominium Act was clear that common expenses must be paid regardless of any other claims between the parties. The Corporation was also awarded costs in the amount of $30,000.
Considering that litigation can be a very slow and long drawn-out process, condominium corporations will be relieved to know that common expenses are payable when due regardless of any set-off claims made by owners.

Comments (1)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endRobert Driscoll - August 16, 2012 11:36 AM
Good article. As a realty consultant and condo mediator I find it surprising how far some disputants go before realizing that they should have retained and listened to sound professional advice. The Condominium Act 1998's s 84(3) "No Avoidance" scenarios - and ONCA here - flatly prohibit witholding periodic common expense contributions. Witholding April 2009-Aug 2011 contributions contrary to prior court orders, is not even disputed here by the dissidents, in a situation with a form of administratorship since 2002. The arrival of legal counsel should help the dissident group IF it listens. Good article.